The Chronology of Conflict: Kashmir
By Naveed Qazi
Countercurrents.org
Countercurrents.org
Kashmir wasn't always
dyed in blood. The people of Kashmir had seen an intellectual
renaissance under the rule of Kushans, who ruled Kashmir in 1st century
AD, after the fallout of the Asoka dynasty. Kushans loved Kashmir, they
often held their court in beautiful springs, and also radicalized the
silk route, which got Kashmir commerce and literary reforms.
Lalitaditya, the great Hindu king of 8th century AD, has been praised by
Kalhana, the first historian of Kashmir, as a just and knowledgeable
king, who was highly praised by his subjects.
Kaniska institutionalized the Buddhist Council in Kashmir which provided
a discourse among Buddhist monks all over the world for decades. The
Great philosopher of India, Najarjuna lived and taught peace in Kashmir.
Even though, the struggles of power intensified from
10th century AD, many Hindu and Sanskrit historians have misinterpreted
Kashmiri history, as rise of Islam started emerging. Shahab-u-Din, the
first Muslim ruler of Kashmir, was married to a Hindu queen, Laxmi and
he always internally consolidated all his subjects belonging from
different faiths. The valley of Kashmir prospered economically under the
reign of his successor, Qutub-ud-Din. Even though the faith of Islam
gained popularity, he was tolerant towards Brahmins, and kept Sanskrit
as the official language. His rule ended in 1470 AD. His grandson,
Sultan Zainul Abideen, popularly known as ‘Bud Shah' is perhaps the best
remembered Muslim king in Kashmir. His love for Kashmir and his
closeness to cultural roots have been ardently recorded. He encouraged
poets, historians, artists and intellectuals. He introduced ‘paper
mache', shawl and carpet weaving traditions which are still in vogue
till date. Unfortunately, in the years to come, the fate of native rule
came to an end when Mughals invaded Kashmir. This marked an era of
weakening sovereignty, a chronology of unfortunate developments,
resulting in a blot which hasn't been cleansed till date.
1586: Akbar sees power instability in Kashmir
during the reign of Yusuf Shah Chak. He invests in this opportunity and
intrudes Kashmir in 1586, ousts out Yusuf, the last Chak ruler and
convicts him in far flung Bihar where he dies in misery and isolation.
Under the guise of land reforms, nobility and grandeur, Kashmir starts
losing its own cultural heritage. People are answerable to alien powers
in Delhi. However, Mughal rule in Kashmir slowly sees its decline from
1707.
1751: The Afghan rule comes to Kashmir through
Ahmad Shah Durrani. Their rule results in extortion and crude religious
fanaticism. They impose heavy taxes, monish handicraft industry. Hindus
are subjected to bias, and their role in administrative service
drastically declines. Eventually, the Afghan rule ends its 47 year of
reign in Kashmir as Sikh dynasty gains prominence.
1819: Maharaja Ranjit Singh of the Sikh dynasty
conquers Kashmir and subjects Kashmir to every kind of oppression.
Kashmiris live under forcible repression and penury, and earn wages by
doing menial jobs. They are heavers of woods and drawers of water. They
aren't even exempt from taxations for grave digging and marriage. Cow
slaughter is punishable to death. Eventually, Sikh dynasty sees its
decline after they lose to the British in the ‘Battle of Sobroan' near
Sutlej, where feudatory of Jammu, Gulab Singh neglects the battle and
plays a significant part in the victory of the British.
1846: Gulab Singh, the Monarch ruler of Jammu,
signs ‘The Treaty of Amritsar' with the British Empire and purchases
Kashmir for Rs. 75 lakhs. The clauses under the treaty integrate Jammu,
Ladakh, Baltistan and other hill states including Kashmir under the
Dogra reign, as a separate border state. Dogras, under control, treat
Kashmir as an occupied state and Jammu as their home state, which
neglects the British in any direct intervention, to improve the plight
of Kashmiris.
1860: ‘ The Treaty of Amritsar' is amended due to
loyalty displayed by Ranbir Singh, in curbing the first Indian mutiny of
1857. Now, the ruler is allowed to select an heir from his collateral
family which results in the succession of Dogras, in an event of present
ruler's death.
1889: A British settlement officer, Walter Lawrence
surveys Kashmir, and comes to a conclusion that Kashmiris live under
such brute oppression which is worse than the Third Estate of the French
Revolution.
1929: In Srinagar, an amalgam of graduates from
Aligard Muslim University, constitute Reading Room Party with an aim for
emancipation of Kashmiris. Ghulam Abbas, an activist from Jammu,
reorganizes Anjuman-i-Islam, a Mirwaiz institution, into Young Men's
Muslim Association of Jammu for the betterment of Muslims.
1931: The masses of Kashmir gain class
consciousness. The revolt against Maharaja Hari Singh gains momentum. It
is viciously subjugated by the constabulary of Maharaja. The Muslim
majority masses are not allowed to represent in the state administrative
apparatus. The lands belong to rich Hindu ‘Jagirdars' who employ
Muslims for tilling, and, would give them paddy which would last for
petty three months. For rest of the months, Kashmiris would often go to
Punjab and other plains to seek industrious labor. They would often die
unsung and unwept.
1932: Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah launches ‘All Jammu
& Kashmir Muslim Conference' against the Maharaja monarchy. It sets
out a manifesto to fight for the sovereignty and liberation of the
Kashmiri masses. The natives give unconditional support to Sheikh
Abdullah. He is widely admired. In the meantime, The Maharaja
constitutes ‘The Glancy Commission' in an effort to redress the
grievances of the masses, by giving recommendations for Muslims in state
services.
1934: Maharaja delays the implementation of the
recommendations, set out by the commission. This creates chaos and leads
to a vehement agitation. Maharaja, under pressure, constitutes a
legislative assembly which eventually turns out to be void and
powerless.
1939: Leaders among the AJKMC [All Jammu &
Kashmir Muslim Conference] get riddled in differences and the party gets
a split. Sheikh Abdullah launches his independent party ‘Jammu &
Kashmir National Conference'.
1946: Sheikh Abdullah harnesses support from the
masses. JKNC launches ‘Quit Kashmir Movement' against Maharaja Monarchy
demanding abrogation of ‘The Treaty of Amritsar' and sovereignty for
the Kashmiri masses. Sheikh Abdullah is taken into custody.
1947: On 15th of August, 1947, India freed itself
from the British Empire. The kings and rulers of the princely states
were encouraged to accede into respective Indian and Pakistani dominions
based on geographical contiguity, religion and cultural adjacency. In
theory, any dominion could have been preferred. In case where a dispute
occurred, the collective aspirations and general will of the people
formed the basis of consideration. Practically, Kashmir was expected to
go with the Dominion of Pakistan based on geographical and religious
factors. Since the Hindu Monarch acceded a Muslim majority state to
India, a grave dispute arose in case of Kashmir, unlike the case of
Junagardh, a mirror image of Kashmir, where India won a plebiscite from
the Hindu masses, resulting in the booting out of a Muslim dominated
reign.
- The Revolt of Poonch: In the spring of 1947, internal unrest begins at Poonch. Muslims rebels stir up public opinion against Maharaja's oppressive and outrageous taxation policy. Several crowds of protestors demanding accession to Pakistan are fired upon. Maharaja dictates the Muslim rebels for surrender under the strengthened Hindu and Sikh garrisons. In late August, the people of Poonch evacuate their kins. The unrest turns into an organized uprising resulting in exodus of 60,000 Muslim refugees to Jammu, till September.
- Jammu Muslim Massacre: In September, under the sponsorship of Maharaja's state forces, armed Hindu and Sikh bandits murder thousands of Muslims out in the open. Survivors forcibly flee Jammu. Pakistan sends a telegram to Kashmir demanding probe into savage atrocities committed. An enquiry is promised which eventually never happens. In the meantime, no communal violence is witnessed in Kashmir.
- The Kabali Invasion: On 22nd October, the tribesmen from Pakistan, storm into Kashmir, and integrate with Poonch Rebels as an umbrageous reaction against the killings of Muslims in Jammu and Poonch. The Kabali tribe is supported by unofficial people and leaders from Pakistan. However, the tribes also engage in plundering and despoil along the way, resulting in exodus of over 10,000 Muslims. India accuses Pakistan for violating the ‘Standstill Agreement'. Pakistan rebuts the allegations. The revolt flares up neighboring Mirpur and Muzaffarabad. ‘Azaad Kashmir' comes into existence with an independent government on 24th October, 1947.
- Indian Army Aggression: The national army of India invades Kashmir to repel the Kabali invasion, on 27th October. There are also cases where the Indian army is accused of committing atrocities towards common Kashmiris. India launches its first military aggression in Kashmir.
- Release of Sheikh Abdullah: In prison, Sheikh Abdullah writes a letter to a friend in Jammu, favoring Kashmir's accession with India. His statement is published at the Congress Press. On September 29th, Sheikh Abdullah is released from the prison, due to increasing pressure from the Indian Government. He would appear in public and would give contradictory speeches of Kashmir's independence before the signing of the accession. On 26th October, he demands the restoration of power to the masses. Then throughout his political life, he would juggle between the accession instrument and the right of self-determination.
- Strategical Disputes : Pakistan claims that Maharaja has no right to initiate the ‘Instrument of Accession' till ‘The Standstill Agreement is in order. Jammu & Kashmir Muslim Conference and the tribal chiefs of Gilgit advice the Maharaja against the accession of Kashmir with India.
- The Instrument of Accession: India signs an accession with The Maharaja on 26th October, 1947. The accession is granted provisional approval until the implementation of the plebiscite. It should be noted that there are no legal provisions relating to conditionalties in the ‘Instrument of Accession' (IOA). It was the ‘White Paper' which was voluntarily designed by the Government of India, thus making a conflict between the legal interpretation and the political promises made to the Kashmiris.
- First Indo-Pak War: India demands Pakistan to withdraw its
troops for the implementation of plebiscite. On the other hand, Pakistan
demands a bilateral demilitarization, with an argument that it would
help in the free and fair implementation of plebiscite, considering
Sheikh Abdullah's friendliness with Jawaharlal Nehru. India refuses. The
first war on Kashmir between India & Pakistan breaks out.
1948: Demanding a resolution of Kashmir , India
takes the case of Kashmir, to the United Nations. World over, Kashmir is
officially recognized as a disputed territory. UN passes a resolution
recommending a third party into consideration: The people of Kashmir.
1949: On 1st January, UN offers a ceasefire between
India and Pakistan. Both countries hold up the occupied parts of
Kashmir. India regains control of some parts of Kashmir, Ladakh &
Jammu, while Pakistan integrates with ‘Azaad Kashmir'.
- UNCIP Formation: On 5th January. UNCIP (United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan) recommends a bilateral demilitarization, a truce agreement for the future, and an implementation of a free and fair plebiscite. Both countries fail to arrive at any peace resolution.
- Indian Constituent Assembly: An ordinance is passed which integrates Article 370 of the Indian Constitution into Kashmir's legal provisions, with foreign affairs, defense, communications and currency under Indian control. Internal autonomy is granted to Kashmir, under the ambit of the Indian constitution.
1951: Indian holds elections and tries to impose
its democratic institution in Kashmir. It is opposed by the United
Nations. They pass a resolution to declare elections void and stress on
plebiscite. India ignores the opposition blatantly. Sheikh Abdullah wins
unopposed and rumors of election rigging plague Kashmiri politics.
1952: Sheikh Abdullah signs the Delhi Agreement on
July, 1952. It chalks out state-centre sharing of power and gives
abidance to Kashmir to have its own flag. Sheikh Abdullah creates
Kashmir centric land reforms which create resentment among the people of
Jammu and Ladakh. Delhi Agreement provides the first genuine erosion in
international resolution of Kashmir.
- Nehru's Speech: ”On August1952, Jawahar Lal Nehru gives a negating speech contradicting the settlement provided in the Delhi Agreement: “Ultimately - I say this with all deference to this Parliament - the decision will be made in the hearts and minds of the men and women of Kashmir; neither in this Parliament, nor in the United Nations nor by anybody else"
1953-1954: Sheikh Abdullah takes U turns and
procrastinates in conforming the accession of Kashmir to India. Sheikh
Abdullah is jailed. In August, Bakhshi Ghulam Muhammad is installed in
place of Sheikh Abdullah. He officially ratifies Kashmir's accession
with India. On April, 1954, India & Pakistan both agree in
appointment of a Plebiscite Administrator.
1956-1957: On 30th October, 1956, J&K
Constituent Assembly adopts a fresh constitution, and dissolves the
Constituent Assembly, which further defines the relationship of Kashmir
with the Indian Dominion. UN strongly condemns the developments and
passes a resolution stating such attempts will not result in any final
resolution. On 26th January, 1957, the new constitution is made
enforceable. Kashmir is now a Republican-Democratic state under Indian
Union.
1964: Sheikh Abdullah is released from jail.
Jawahar Lal Nehru sends Sheikh Abdullah with a delegation to Pakistan in
an effort to find a resolution discourse for Kashmir. In the meantime,
masses in Kashmir protest against the implementation of Article 356
& 357, which allows Indian central authority over constituting
legislative powers in Kashmir. The special status of Kashmir continues
to get eroded.
1965-1971: The nomenclature is changed from
‘Sadr-e-Riyasat' to Governor and from Prime Minister to Chief Minister.
The Governor is now no longer elected locally, and is installed as per
the orders of the President of India. This amendment lightens off
Kashmir from its special titles. Free & fair elections in the guise
of democracy are championed as just causes, and Indian mainstream
parties are allowed to contest in the elections. However, these
elections aren't well received by the public. In many cases,
international watchdogs accuse India of rigging elections. In 1967,
Jammu Autonomy Forum is constituted with the aim of institutionalizing
regional autonomy.
1972: Plebiscite Front is banned from constituting
elections, and in the meantime, India and Pakistan, both, sign ‘The
Simla Agreement' which settles a basis for a bilateral solution for
Kashmir through talks. The provisions also state that both nations
should determine their military policies by respecting the Line of
Control (LOC)
1974: Sheikh Abdullah signs an accord with the
Government of India, on November, 1974. This agreement retains Kashmir's
so called ‘Special Status', but its obliged to act under the Indian
dominion. Sheikh Abdullah is again made the Head of the state. This time
as the Chief Minister of Jammu & Kashmir.
1977-1983: Jammu & Kashmir National Conference
wins back to back elections in 1977 and 1983. International watchdogs
accuse India of rigging elections again. In 1979, Afghanistan would
recommend an Islamic Republic for Kashmir. Sikri Commission is also
appointed in the same year in an effort to redress local grievances
existent among the masses.
1987-1989: Farooq Abdullah comes into power in the
1987 election. He forms a coalition government with the Indian National
Congress. This election, due to the nature of its immense rigging
accusations, provides a scope for voicing dissent and it catalyzes deep
resentment, not only amongst the secessionist political arena of
Kashmir, but also suffers huge disfavor from public as well. Armed
insurgency also gets on a rise. Due to its catastrophic effects, in the
whole year of 1988 , world witnesses Kashmiris pouring out on streets,
sloganeering anti-India demonstrations, which are deeply resisted by
police firing, crackdowns, mass killings and curfew culture. The rigging
of 1987 elections provides an offshoot platform for the demand for
self-determination. From 1989, the Indian government tries to sabotage
the rising secessionist movement through a central rule of authority for
seven years.
1990: An ultra-Hindu nationalist leaning regulator,
Jagmohan is appointed as the Governor of Kashmir. Farooq Abdullah
resigns as the Chief Minister of Kashmir, and all powers are vested in
the central rule. In the same year, about 100 protestors are fired upon
in Gawkadal area. This event marks as the first brutal mass killing
genocide in Kashmir. The people blame this notorious event on the
administrators and it becomes the insurgency for the entire population.
With violence a catalyst, Kashmir becomes a land of blood dyed
subjugation. Over one million people protest on streets and 40 more are
slained.
- March : A sense of insecurity rises among the Kashmiri Pandit community. Paranoias of pogroms force Pandits for an exodus, as even the Jagmohan's administration discourages any reconciliation between two communities. With the result, more than one lakh Pandits flock off Kashmir.
- May: Over two million people attend the funeral march of the
slain spiritual leader of Kashmir, Mirwaiz Maulvi Muhammad Farooq; over
100 mourners are fired upon by the police. The grave irresponsibility of
Jagmohan's administration forces Government of India for a replacement
in Girish Saxena
1993: All Parties Hurriyiat Conference (APHC) is
formed on specialist political lines to promote the cause of Kashmiri
nationalism. It is aimed to promote a solution based on the UN Charter,
its resolutions, and through a tri-partite negotiation between India,
Pakistan and Kashmir. The amalgam, since its inception, has received
criticism from Indian state actors, and praise from Pakistan and
international watchdogs for its political measures and tactics in
handling the grave dispute of Kashmir.
1998: Political leaders across the borders sign
‘The Lahore Agreement' which includes settlement of all outstanding
disputes including Kashmir.
- June: Farooq Abdullah designs the RAC [Regional Autonomy Committee] of 8 units comprising of Ladadkh, Jammu and Kashmir without proposing any devolution of political and economic powers.
2000: On March, a notorious event about massacre of
Sikhs at Chittisinghpora makes headlines. Kashmiris blame rebel
militants recruited by Indian security forces, while India blames
foreign militants. No judicial commission has been implemented to
enquire about this killing till date. In June, the State Autonomy Report
[SAR] puts a discourse on the future political initiative on Kashmir.
The central government rejects the recommendation in July. In November,
the Indian government announces ceasefire with the armed groups, which
gets violated in two weeks after India refuses to acknowledge Pakistan
in tri-partite dialogue over the Kashmir dispute.
2001: In July 2001, India & Pakistan under the
leadership of PM Vajpayee and President Musharaf fail to arrive at a
settlement on the Kashmir issue, despite five long arduous one on one,
hours of meetings. Some plans were chalked out on Kashmir including free
trade, demilitarization, shared autonomy but they don't get initiated
due to failure in reconciling differences due to bilateral complexities.
2002: On May 21 , an eminent moderate separatist
leader, Abdul Gani Lone is assassinated by unidentified gunmen. This is
the same day on which Mirwaiz Moulvi Farooq was killed as well.
Kashmir's history is rewritten in blood. Thousands attend his funeral
prayers. Several theories of pro-government gunmen or the role of
foreign militants has been rumored, but no investigation has been
carried out till date.
2008: People are provoked by the state government
through a controversial land deal, of 100 acres of land to a local
Shrine Board, managing pilgrimages and local Hindu affairs in the
valley, near the Amarnath cave, in May. A cave discovered by a Muslim
shepherd in the mid- 19th century, is worshipped by Hindus as a deity of
destruction. Beginning as a small pilgrimage, it was eventually offset
into a mega event by the Hindu nationalist institutions. In June, Muslim
masses of Kashmir protest against the land deal, waging a war on
streets through wavering of Islamic flags, hurling stones and bricks. On
August 11, there is a march towards Jehlum Valley road, which once,
connected Kashmir with Pakistan. Similar massive protests followed near
the United Nations Observer's Group. Kashmir is locked for months. Over
100 people are killed, over a short span of 2 months, including eminent
separatist leader, Sheikh Aziz. It provides a renewed basis for self
determination against the Indian state. Many liberal political
commentators and intellectuals from India like Vir Sanghvi, Arundhati
Roy and Jug Suraiya express their anguish over the turmoil and
recommended ‘Azaadi' or freedom for Kashmir in open media forums.
However, the agitation is eventually crushed by the Indian state through
brute army aggression and curfew hegemony.
2010: The last year of the decade in Kashmir
provides the most belligerent political atmosphere in waging a war
against the Indian state. On June 11, at a protest gathering, Tufail
Ahmad Matto, gets killed after receiving a tear gas shell, which blows
his brains out. His death provides a charged catalyst in reincarnating
the crushed agitation of 2008. Protestors shout anti-India slogans,
processions continue even till late nights, people burn government
buildings, defy curfew, attack Indian forces in the bunkers, and demand
complete demilitarization of Kashmir. Citing human rights abuses,
separatist leaders organize protest calendars which last for over 4
months, paralyzing the local life. Over 110 people get killed in the
process. Indian Government after witnessing the intensity of upheaval
recommends autonomy proposals, job generation promises and compensation
to victims. These developments, however, are all are blatantly refused
by both leaders and masses of Kashmir. The Indian government also
announces the role of three eminent interlocutors in mediating the
Kashmir dispute which till now has resulted as a futile and ineffective
exercise.
No comments:
Post a Comment